The Spread Maps Request an invite

Was the forecast right for Minneapolis on Thu Jul 30?

Minneapolis, Minnesota · daily high temperature in °F · forecasts from each model's archived runs, verified against the ECMWF IFS analysis

4 days out, 7 models put Minneapolis's Thu Jul 30 high anywhere from 85° to 97°;by the final call, the day before, the field had settled to a median of 90°. The day verified at 90° against the ECMWF IFS analysis — drizzle.

AIGFS landed closest, off by 0.1°. GEM ran 5° warm.

4 days out the models said 85–97; it hit 90. AIGFS led (off 0.1°F); GEM ran 5°F warm.
The shareable card for this receipt — what this page looks like pasted into a thread.

What every model said, at every lead

Daily-high calls for Thu Jul 30 as each model's runs approached it — the last archived run per day. NBM and The Spread's own blend are consensus products and stay out of these ranges and rankings; the Minneapolis scoreboard shows them, labelled.

Lead AIFSAIGFSECMWFGEMGFSICONUKMO Range
4d · 2026-07-26 85° 90° 97° 88° 91° 94° 93° 85–97°
3d · 2026-07-27 87° 93° 94° 86° 91° 91° 92° 86–94°
2d · 2026-07-28 88° 89° 93° 89° 97° 90° 92° 88–97°
1d · 2026-07-29 86° 90° 90° 94° 93° 91° 90° 86–94°
actual 90°

Read it honestly

This is one date, not a league table. A model can win a day it deserved to lose; rankings only mean something over a window. For that, see which model has been most accurate in Minneapolis — or every city The Spread scores.

Forecasts are what each model's archived runs said at the time, captured at The Spread's sweep times — never reconstructed after the fact. Truth is the ECMWF IFS analysis (temperature_2m_max). The actual values are the ones in hand when this receipt was settled, usually 2 days after the date; a correction published after that is not carried into it. Archive depth varies by city; receipts exist only for dates the archive watched arrive.