The Spread Maps Request an invite

Was the forecast right for New York on Thu Jul 30?

New York, New York · daily high temperature in °F · forecasts from each model's archived runs, verified against the ECMWF IFS analysis

4 days out, 7 models put New York's Thu Jul 30 high anywhere from 72° to 82°;by the final call, the day before, the field had settled to a median of 78°. The day verified at 77° against the ECMWF IFS analysis, with 0.22 in of precipitation — rain.

ECMWF landed closest, off by 0.4°. GEM ran 3° warm.

4 days out the models said 72–82; it hit 77. ECMWF led (off 0.4°F); GEM ran 3°F warm.
The shareable card for this receipt — what this page looks like pasted into a thread.

What every model said, at every lead

Daily-high calls for Thu Jul 30 as each model's runs approached it — the last archived run per day. NBM and The Spread's own blend are consensus products and stay out of these ranges and rankings; the New York scoreboard shows them, labelled.

Lead AIFSAIGFSECMWFGEMGFSICONUKMO Range
4d · 2026-07-26 75° 75° 82° 72° 74° 77° 77° 72–82°
3d · 2026-07-27 80° 73° 76° 72° 79° 72° 80° 72–80°
2d · 2026-07-28 77° 75° 75° 79° 74° 76° 81° 74–81°
1d · 2026-07-29 77° 75° 78° 80° 75° 78° 78° 75–80°
actual 77°

Read it honestly

This is one date, not a league table. A model can win a day it deserved to lose; rankings only mean something over a window. For that, see which model has been most accurate in New York — or every city The Spread scores.

Forecasts are what each model's archived runs said at the time, captured at The Spread's sweep times — never reconstructed after the fact. Truth is the ECMWF IFS analysis (temperature_2m_max). The actual values are the ones in hand when this receipt was settled, usually 2 days after the date; a correction published after that is not carried into it. Archive depth varies by city; receipts exist only for dates the archive watched arrive.