The Spread Maps Request an invite

Was the forecast right for Los Angeles on Thu Jul 30?

Los Angeles, California · daily high temperature in °C · forecasts from each model's archived runs, verified against the ECMWF IFS analysis

4 days out, 7 models put Los Angeles's Thu Jul 30 high anywhere from 29° to 33°;by the final call, the day before, the field had settled to a median of 30°. The day verified at 33° against the ECMWF IFS analysis — cloudy.

ECMWF landed closest, off by 0.4°. AIGFS ran 7° cool.

4 days out the models said 29–33; it hit 33. ECMWF led (off 0.4°C); AIGFS ran 7°C cool.
The shareable card for this receipt — what this page looks like pasted into a thread.

What every model said, at every lead

Daily-high calls for Thu Jul 30 as each model's runs approached it — the last archived run per day. NBM and The Spread's own blend are consensus products and stay out of these ranges and rankings; the Los Angeles scoreboard shows them, labelled.

Lead AIFSAIGFSECMWFGEMGFSICONUKMO Range
4d · 2026-07-26 30° 29° 33° 33° 33° 30° 31° 29–33°
3d · 2026-07-27 30° 26° 34° 31° 33° 30° 31° 26–34°
2d · 2026-07-28 29° 26° 33° 31° 32° 29° 31° 26–33°
1d · 2026-07-29 29° 26° 33° 30° 31° 28° 32° 26–33°
actual 33°

Read it honestly

This is one date, not a league table. A model can win a day it deserved to lose; rankings only mean something over a window. For that, see which model has been most accurate in Los Angeles — or every city The Spread scores.

Forecasts are what each model's archived runs said at the time, captured at The Spread's sweep times — never reconstructed after the fact. Truth is the ECMWF IFS analysis (temperature_2m_max). The actual values are the ones in hand when this receipt was settled, usually 4 days after the date; a correction published after that is not carried into it. Archive depth varies by city; receipts exist only for dates the archive watched arrive.