The Spread Maps Request an invite

Was the forecast right for Chicago on Fri Jul 31?

Chicago, Illinois · daily high temperature in °F · forecasts from each model's archived runs, verified against the ECMWF IFS analysis

5 days out, 7 models put Chicago's Fri Jul 31 high anywhere from 76° to 88°;by the final call, the day before, the field had settled to a median of 82°. The day verified at 81° against the ECMWF IFS analysis, with 0.49 in of precipitation — rain.

GFS landed closest, off by 0.5°. UKMO ran 3° warm.

5 days out the models said 76–88; it hit 81. GFS led (off 0.5°F); UKMO ran 3°F warm.
The shareable card for this receipt — what this page looks like pasted into a thread.

What every model said, at every lead

Daily-high calls for Fri Jul 31 as each model's runs approached it — the last archived run per day. NBM and The Spread's own blend are consensus products and stay out of these ranges and rankings; the Chicago scoreboard shows them, labelled.

Lead AIFSAIGFSECMWFGEMGFSICONUKMO Range
5d · 2026-07-26 80° 81° 78° 78° 76° 88° 87° 76–88°
4d · 2026-07-27 79° 81° 87° 80° 77° 87° 88° 77–88°
3d · 2026-07-28 77° 78° 81° 72° 80° 83° 83° 72–83°
2d · 2026-07-29 77° 78° 85° 82° 81° 83° 81° 77–85°
1d · 2026-07-30 79° 80° 82° 84° 81° 83° 84° 79–84°
actual 81°

Read it honestly

This is one date, not a league table. A model can win a day it deserved to lose; rankings only mean something over a window. For that, see which model has been most accurate in Chicago — or every city The Spread scores.

Forecasts are what each model's archived runs said at the time, captured at The Spread's sweep times — never reconstructed after the fact. Truth is the ECMWF IFS analysis (temperature_2m_max). The actual values are the ones in hand when this receipt was settled, usually 2 days after the date; a correction published after that is not carried into it. Archive depth varies by city; receipts exist only for dates the archive watched arrive.