The Spread Maps Request an invite

Was the forecast right for Chicago on Thu Jul 30?

Chicago, Illinois · daily high temperature in °F · forecasts from each model's archived runs, verified against the ECMWF IFS analysis

4 days out, 7 models put Chicago's Thu Jul 30 high anywhere from 80° to 88°;by the final call, the day before, the field had settled to a median of 83°. The day verified at 84° against the ECMWF IFS analysis — cloudy.

AIFS landed closest, off by 1.5°. GFS ran 8° cool.

4 days out the models said 80–88; it hit 84. AIFS led (off 1.5°F); GFS ran 8°F cool.
The shareable card for this receipt — what this page looks like pasted into a thread.

What every model said, at every lead

Daily-high calls for Thu Jul 30 as each model's runs approached it — the last archived run per day. NBM and The Spread's own blend are consensus products and stay out of these ranges and rankings; the Chicago scoreboard shows them, labelled.

Lead AIFSAIGFSECMWFGEMGFSICONUKMO Range
4d · 2026-07-26 80° 83° 83° 83° 88° 84° 84° 80–88°
3d · 2026-07-27 80° 85° 89° 77° 89° 86° 84° 77–89°
2d · 2026-07-28 82° 82° 83° 83° 83° 88° 87° 82–88°
1d · 2026-07-29 83° 82° 87° 83° 76° 87° 86° 76–87°
actual 84°

Read it honestly

This is one date, not a league table. A model can win a day it deserved to lose; rankings only mean something over a window. For that, see which model has been most accurate in Chicago — or every city The Spread scores.

Forecasts are what each model's archived runs said at the time, captured at The Spread's sweep times — never reconstructed after the fact. Truth is the ECMWF IFS analysis (temperature_2m_max). The actual values are the ones in hand when this receipt was settled, usually 2 days after the date; a correction published after that is not carried into it. Archive depth varies by city; receipts exist only for dates the archive watched arrive.